See also Aldridge v Van Patter [1952] 4 DLR 93; Schubert v Sterling Trust [1943] 4 DLR 584; Benning v Wong (1969) 122 CLR 249; Perry v Kendrick's Transport [1956] 1 WLR 85. Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) As water is likely to do mischief if it escapes - and this water did escape out of the reservoir and down the mineshafts - the defendant was liable for all the damages that were a natural consequence of that mistake. Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB) R v Wilson [1996] Crim LR 573 More recent cases, however, such as the House of Lords decision in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council , [58] have confirmed that Rylands is "a remedy for damage to land or interests in land. Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569 Barclays Bank v O Brien[1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Barclays Bank v O Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (General) The owner of the ride was held liable. Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Clinical Negligence Paris Hilton - of partial English descent. CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (General) Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 Snook v Mannion [1982] Crim LR 601 Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44 An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012) McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246 2. The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008]UKHL 48 Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Employers Liability Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. whey jennings date of birthgarberiel battery charger manual 26th February 2023 / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81 Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898 Hale v Jenning Bros, The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Breach In cases such as Hale v Jennings Bros, Judges upheld the claimants claim in that it utilized the ruling in Rylands to find the defendant liable for personal injury. The owner of the ride was held liable. Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62 British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 'The thing' escaped and caused reasonably forseeable damage. Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) L.R. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Required fields are marked *. What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Youssoupoff v MGM (1934) 50 TLR 581, Z v UK [2001] 34 EHRR 97 Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192 Holmes v Ashford [1950] 2 All ER 76 swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Scott LJ [1938] 1 All ER 579 England and Wales Citing: Cited Rylands v Fletcher HL 1868 The defendant had constructed a reservoir to supply water to his mill. Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6 Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 THE ULTIMATE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE DOUGLAS ADAMS Complete & Unabridged Contents: Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 . John v MGN [1997] QB 586 Assignment help question originally from Pace Scholar. Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Report year ends Sept. 30. What do I do if I find asbestos? Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use) Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Brice v Brown [1984] 1 All ER 997 Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243 Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Hamer v Sidway (1891) Lowery v Walker [1911] AC 10, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. The owner of the ride was held liable. Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. "Prepared at the Dept. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. 3. 3803 Facts: There was a fault in the electrical wiring of a business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres. Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: caudesucre.com Cau de sucre - blog de repostera creativa, recetas dulces y mucha fotografa! Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1937] UKHL 2 Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187 You can search individual genealogies from the Advanced Search page by choosing a particular tree from the Trees pop up menu. White v John Warwick [1953] 1 WLR 1285 Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89 Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331 One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!). Scott v London & St Katherine Docks (1865) 3 H&C 596 Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830 North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies. Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904 Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 573 Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358 What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705 This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741 Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049 Stone v Taffe [1974] 1 WLR 1575 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96 Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Causation Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441 Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93 White v Blackmore [1972] 3 WLR 296 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, X & Y v Hounslow London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 286, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856 Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation) Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328 Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277 Tuberville v Savage (1669) 1 Mod Rep 3 Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26 A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923 Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 What are some of :Economics, 1. Smith v Leech Brain [1962] 2 QB 405 Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740, LEstrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences Clarke v Dickson (1858) EB & E 148 Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 Job title: Service Advisor. Watt v Longsdon [1930] 1 KB 130 Report it! Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611 Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623 Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554 Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 General Duty of Care What is asbestos and what are the risks from it? Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F? The American Sports Publishing Company. Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860 Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] EWCA Civ 39 Tweddle v Atkinson[1861] EWHC QB J57, UCB v Williams [2002] EWCA Civ 555 3. Otley Museum & Archive Trust. Lagden v OConnor [2003] UKHL 64 The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Offer Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care Horsfall v Thomas [1862] 1 H&C 90 Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 . Reynolds v Clarke (1725) 92 ER 410 What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve? Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130 For any enquiries, email our support affiliate selectessays@gmail.com, Your email address will not be published. Ritchie v Atkinson (1808) 10 East 295 Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705 (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.com.mx: Tienda Kindle R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 Robinson v Kilvert (1889) 41 Ch D 88 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125 Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2 WLR 474 Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care Stanton v Collinson [2010] EWCA Civ 81 Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. . Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10 Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) Kerensa Jennings Expand search. The owner of the ride was held liable. Black v Fife Coal [1912] AC 149 Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Legitimate Unlawful Act) Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo The imaginative and intelligent collections created in the 1980s and 1990s by Gianni Versace (1946-1997) have earned him a position of prominence in the history of late-twentieth century fashion. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Routledge v Grant (1828) 130 ER 920 McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Hochster v De la Tour(1853) 2 E & B 678 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597 Regardez le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel. Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Your email address will not be published. Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459 Delaney v Pickett [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Breach Bettini v Gye(1876) QBD 183 Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care McAlpine v Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB) Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 Diesen v Samson (1971) SLT (Sh Ct) 49 Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. Smith v Littlewoods [1987] AC 241 Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274 Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696 Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care Judge: Lords Bingham, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias. Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155 Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) 39 Eg Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co Ltd (1918) 34 TLR 500; Schiffman v Order of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579. Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrack [2001] EWCA Civ 1236 Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157 Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd [1945] KB 189 What are maximum exposure limits? Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! AC 556 Act of a 3rd party Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263; Hale v. Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579; Shiffman v. Order of St. John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Statutory Authority Smeaton v. McKinnon Industries v Walker [1951] 3 DLR 577 Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (coming to the nuisance) Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141 Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333 Beswick v Beswick[1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 226, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care, Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. R v Rimmington [2005] UKHL 63 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) R v Jones & Smith [1976]1 WLR 672 Mattis v Pollack [2003] 1 WLR 2158 Company: Toyota North America Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518 DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Rules) David Henrie - father of half English descent. Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271 Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 666 Cutter v Powell[1795] EWHC KB J13, D & C Builders v Rees[1966] 2 WLR 28 Wieland v Cyril Lord Carpets [1969] 3 All ER 1006 Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 For example, rocks and thistles naturally occur on land. 2. D operated a chair o plane ride, one of the chairs broke loose and hit c. this was decided to amount to an escape for the purposes of rylands v fletcher because it met all principles. Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions) Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509 Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518 Wilson v Tyneside Cleaning Co [1958] 2 QB 110 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation What are the COSHH Regulations :Economics, 1. Hillas v Arcos [1932] UKHL 2 Junior Books v Veitchi (1983), Kennaway v Thompson [1981] QB 88 Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1 Calculate your paper price 275 words) [2] Although other torts (e.g. Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Collins v Wilcock [1984] 3 All ER 374 CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Cas. Location: Dallas, TX. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73 Chester v Ashfar [2004] 3 WLR 927 Lewis v Avery[1971] 3 WLR 603
Tamar Valley Dairy Jobs, Articles H