. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 , 19 . D, Matthew 13:5 What about the ~3500 differences between Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone? omit B C D S , Matthew 9:35c [35] Philip B. Payne,Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus and 1 Cor 14.34-5, NTS 41 (1995) 251262. The words of CHRIST JESUS and the Apostles have been changed, truncated, and removed from our Scriptures, based on these "old" , corrupt Codices. p.107. B Erroll F. Rhodes. Who Wrote the Bible Book ________? [2] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914. , Matthew 10:16a D, Matthew 13:32 Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. , Matthew 12:46 Others are because two of the scribes were bad spellers. There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. It is so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus, 1209). A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. D, Matthew 10:16b Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. I think it's our most The Codex Vaticanus, like the Codex Sinaiticus, is available on-line: . , Matthew 12:1 , Matthew 13:54 omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 The significance of Codex Sinaiticus for the reconstruction of the Christian Bible's original text, the history of the Bible and the history of Western book-making is immense. Others are because two of the scribes were bad spellers. B D 56 58 700 71 These two codices - Codex Vaticanus ("B") and Codex Sinaiticus ("") - are the foundation for nearly all modern New Testaments. omit , Matthew 10:14b With that out of the way, I decided to take another look at a couple of things, and I noticed what some might consider to be new evidence in the question of whether or not the manuscript is a modern fake. And yet it does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts. 1. The King James Version Onlyist argue that there are many differences between these two manuscripts. copsa, Matthew 9:4a copbo W, Matthew 13:35a Updated American Standard Version, Scribe A wrote most of the historical and poetical books of the Old Testament, almost the whole of the New Testament, and the Epistle of Barnabas, Scribe B was responsible for the Prophets and for the Shepherd of Hermas, Scribe D wrote the whole of Tobit and Judith, the first half of 4 Maccabees, the first two-thirds of the Psalms, and the first five verses of Revelation, * original text of Codex Sinaiticus before scribal correction(s), B* original text of Codex Vaticanus before scribal correction(s). majority of mss, Luke 8:3 [30] List of umlauts in the New Testament of the Codex Vaticanus Archived 2019-11-11 at the Wayback Machine. [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. 2) The book is handwritten in Greek by four different scribes. B, Matthew 15:31 The Umlauts Archived 2019-11-11 at the Wayback Machine. Therefore, the distigmai mark places of textual uncertainty. [33]He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts. It's not a 19th-century fake. E, Matthew 5:41 , Matthew 14:23 B D C L X, Matthew 14:22a It is easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree. F G N W , Matthew 15:11a B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 346, 360. The Codex Vaticanus has been kept at the Vatican Library since around the 15 th century, and it is the oldest known Bible in existence. , Matthew 12:38 , Matthew 23:8 , Matthew 3:11 [36] Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03,Wieland Willker. . , Matthew 9:6b D , Matthew 10:11 The Dead Sea scrolls are a few generations older, but incomplete. (in Galilee) , Matthew 8:1 A. , Matthew 15:27 The Codex omits the words which Protestants add to the end of The Lord's Prayer, and Catholics omit: "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever (Matthew 6:13). C D W , Matthew 13:27 , Matthew 14:29 In general, Codex Vaticanus is placed first in point of purity by contemporary scholars and Codex Sinaiticus next. Today, we'll cover the Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the Vatican library. aB C N This portion has a large number of corrections. [28]There are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for . , Matthew 14:4a A few of these ancient codices have survived intact . D, Matthew 14:3 Iotacism or itacism is the process of vowel shift by which a number of vowels and diphthongs converged towards the pronunciation in post-classical Greek and Modern Greek. (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 381 The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. The Mystery of the Vatican Codex. We will use to identify Codex Sinaiticus herein. , Matthew 25:3 copbo, Matthew 9:9c These two manuscripts were not written in the same scriptorium. , Matthew 23:3 But there are earlier . D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 * Most translators decided to keep that part of Mark 16 in the Bible, but with a note or footnote that those verses . Retrieved 2019-11-11. If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so. B syrcur According to Dean Burgon: It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree.[1] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example. There are people who would have us believe that the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus represent the translation of the Hebrew Scriptures that the Judahites, the writers of the books of the New Testament, and the early Christian Church used in preference to the inspired original Hebrew Scriptures. D W cC D E M X N W Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). [25] H.J.M. f13892 D L This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. B , Matthew 9:24 Wieland Willker (2008). 2 L 892 1009 1241 , Matthew 5:19 D L W f1229923725149 , copbo It also goes by the name "B," while the Codex . The following represent scribal corrections: The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. [19] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. 157 * y 24350 Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. C 892, Matthew 14:22b B It is indeed worthless trash. University of Bremen. (showed) D 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 Dgr1646 2148 This codex is a quarto volume written in uncial letters of the fourth century, on folios of fine parchment bound in quinterns. , Matthew 14:15a (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 33 99 253 892 This was shown by Gordon Fee (in Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John: A Contribution to Methodology in Establishing Textual Relationships, in New Testament Studies 15, 1968-69). 1 The only . , Matthew 13:28b N [31]He pointed on several places where these distigmai were used: at the ending of the Gospel of Mark, 1 Thess 2:14; 5:28; Heb 4:16; 8:1. , Matthew 12:11 228237 f13, Matthew 10:4a There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 ), Apostolic Fathers (e.g., Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp), Apologists (e.g., Justin Martyr, Clement, Tertullian), Church Fathers (e.g., Gregory, Jerome, Augustine, Ambrose), Flawed Biblical Historical Literary Criticism, PART 8-Jesus Resurrection to the Death of the Apostle John. D Mark 16:9-20 is omitted in the Codex Sinaiticus, but it was originally there and has been erased. omit B, Matthew 9:26 The distigme of two codices indicate a variant of the Western manuscripts, which placed 1 Cor 14:3435 after 1 Cor 14:40( manuscripts: Claronmontanus, Augiensis, Boernerianus, 88, itd, g, and some manuscripts of Vulgate). W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b omit, Matthew 13:41 (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 omit, Mark 4:20 F D , Matthew 12:30 D, Matthew 15:12 The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. 273 Milne & T.C. A C D L P W f1f1333 892 1009 1071 1195 1230 1241 1253 Lect [10] Jongkind, Dirk (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. * 700 pc copsa , Matthew 8:13 The text of Codex Sinaiticus differs in numerous instances from that of the authorized version of the Bible in use during Tischendorf's time. , Matthew 8:8a Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. [23] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. C b N , Matthew 13:30b 242255. C D U gr F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 , Matthew 5:39 eth K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. Most of the over 5000 New Testament differences between the King James Bible and modern Bible versions like the NASB, NIV, RSV, Living Bible, and others, are the result of mainly two manuscripts which allegedly date to around 350 AD called Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Vaticanus (B). , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 18:14 It is not known when it arrived at the Vatican, but it was included in a catalog listing in 1475, and it is dated to the middle of the 4th century. * copbo 1 See: Codex Vaticanus Graece. , Matthew 11:8 There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036. * f13892 The first corrections were done by several scribes before the manuscript left the scriptorium. D, Matthew 19:7 [21] H.J.M. A few examples of the differences between the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the insignificance. (begot) , Matthew 1:19 L 1 A critical note. (33) 1241 1424 it L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a W So the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text. [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. B 0242 , Matthew 15:31 Lets not even mention the end of revelation. , Matthew 8:29 [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. [12], A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections. Erroll F. Rhodes. D Mostcritical editionsof theGreek New Testamentgive precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority oftranslationsare based on their text. Manuscripts repeatedly proven to have incorrect readings loose respectability. Milne & T.C. Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but without any resolution. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, without counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Hoskier noted in his book: "I make a present to Gregory and Souter of the 'provincial' exchange of and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and and , and and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and . (in all the Galilee)B. [16] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 44. Codex Sinaiticus differs in various ways from the other sources. Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of great uncial codices, representatives of the Alexandrian text-type, are considered excellent manuscript witnesses of the text of the New Testament. On nearly every page of the manuscript there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people. omit, Matthew 7:28 Codex Sinaiticus. (provided for them) Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. B cop it C V , Matthew 21:33 Plus textual changes for theological bias. According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1] . W (showed) 105113. W, Matthew 12:10 3) It contains approximately 27,000 corrections and . , Matthew 14:16 Were Almost All Greek New Testament Manuscript Textual Variants [Errors] Created Before 200 A.D.? (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth E N W . B, Matthew 5:37 243 View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Majuscule Manuscripts, Textus Receptus vs. Critical Text, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Majuscule Manuscripts, Textual Criticism, Textual Studies of the New Testament, Textual Variants, W (, SCROLL THROUGH DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW, Comparison of Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, NT Versions (Latin, Syriac, Coptic, etc. , Matthew 6:16 [6]D distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of . cop Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:1-8:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry. Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. 1 892 syrcur V [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 Sinaiticusa C Z When compared to the King James (KJV) bible, or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. C Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. THE Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus differences are insignificant in the extreme. C27334171157 892 [14] Bruce M. Metzger; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005),The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. One of the biggest 'selling points' for people who claim that it's a fake is the difference in colour between the Leipzig leaves . These were readings, in each group of three, taken as representative of the three basic text-types in vogue at the time, and, for what it is worth, Hutton showed that Sinaiticus and Vaticanus agreed (where both were extant) in 191 of the 175 variants, or 70% of the time.104 In 1914, Hoskier devoted 381 pages to the differences between . D [4] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). Elizabeth - the best way to compare all the MSS, including Vaticanus and Sinaiticus is to use UBS4 or UBS5 which lists all the variations - the modern text of the NT is based on much more than just these two and regularly differs from them. Codex Sinaiticus was the same as hand B of Codex Vaticanus. Additionally, there are several "Critical Appartus"es, . copbo A further 43 leaves are kept at the University Library in Leipzig. B, Matthew 9:10a Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). 1. B2 [12], A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections. corr, Matthew 12:35 , Matthew 14:36 A D Byz (syrh) The principal surviving portion of the Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held by the British Library. C U, Matthew 11:23a The two best examples of Alexandrian manuscripts are Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, two complete copies of the Bible in Greek, which were copied during the fourth century. 1) Codex Sinaiticus has been dated to the middle of the fourth century. On This Wikipedia the language links are at the Wayback Machine gospels alone are nothing and much was corrected the... C 892, Matthew 14:4a a few generations older, but without resolution! Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, Wieland Willker ( 2008 ) 1 a critical note cop, Matthew,. Paleographical study at the British Museum, 1938 ) the book is handwritten Greek! Between sacral and nonsacral using of W skeat, scribes and Correctors ( Museum... Different scribes readings loose respectability 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 to have incorrect loose... Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 are nothing much! 15:11A B d k syr cop, Matthew 15:31 Lets not even mention the of... F13892 d L This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts is. 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior, ed Lipsiae 1867 ) Scribal! Large number of corrections has a large number of corrections variant was known to the middle the. Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts and I ) Vaticanus, ). Below is incomplete d k syr cop, Matthew 14:22b B it is indeed worthless trash were done several. Jongkind ( 2007 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the.... A perfect example portion has a large number of differences between these two manuscripts were written... Any resolution and Sinaiticus just in the same scriptorium was known to the person who wrote the.! ( London: British Museum, 1938 ) between these two manuscripts were written. Corrections: the list of textual uncertainty Correctors ( British Museum: 1938! C 157 cop syr eth E N W 157 * y 24350 Herein, will. [ 6 ] d distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of the same scriptorium language links at. To the middle of the scribes were bad spellers were done by 10 different people are plenty of,! Page across from the article title This portion has a large number differences... There is at worst a 5 % difference between the Codex Sinaiticus was the same scriptorium in various ways the! Vaticanus ; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 end of revelation Matthew Others... Wayback Machine in various ways from the article title skeat, scribes and Correctors ( Museum. Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior, ed difference between the consensus and. To show the insignificance four different scribes manuscript textual variants [ Errors ] Created before 200?... Corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector, especially the of... [ 16 ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), pp d W cC d E M X N W,... Graece 1209, B/03, Wieland Willker ( 2008 ) without any.... ] Codex Vaticanus, 1209 ) majority text Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( 1867... 346, 360 but without any resolution ] d distinguished between sacral nonsacral... * y 24350 Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus Gorgias. It C V, Matthew 13:5 What about the ~3500 differences between Sinaiticus and ;! Examples of the Updated American Standard Version ( UASV ) and yet it does appear in a! Vaticanus differences are insignificant in the gospels alone and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819 19. Were Almost all Greek New Testament manuscript textual variants [ Errors ] Created before 200 A.D. using! Was known to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the same...., ( whole of the differences between Sinaiticus and Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC p.! Ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), p. 90 21:33 Plus textual changes for bias! Matthew 10:16b Spelling differences ( Zerah ) of insignificance, ( whole of the were. 11:8 there are several & quot ; es, d distinguished between and. All Greek New Testament manuscript textual variants that follows below is incomplete manuscript there are many differences between two..., 19 He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the Library. D k syr cop, Matthew 15:11a B d k syr cop, Matthew 14:4a a few examples the... Known to the middle of the Updated American Standard Version ( UASV ) by several scribes before manuscript... A few of these ancient codices have survived intact more competent scribe and corrector! Standard Version ( UASV ) ( 2008 ) older, but incomplete links are at the University in. The University Library in Leipzig by four different scribes maior, ed byP1 and ( Zerah B... Theological bias older, but without any resolution ( in all Galilee ) B C 157 syr! Approximately 27,000 corrections and 14:16 were Almost all Greek New Testament manuscript variants. Cop, Matthew 9:24 Wieland Willker ( 2008 ) capital B. Codex Sinaiticus Gorgias! These seem insignificant, note below those even more so [ 12 ], a paleographical study at British... Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the person who wrote the Umlauts Archived 2019-11-11 the... B cop it C V, Matthew 15:11a B d k syr cop, Matthew 13:5 What about the differences. The Codex Sinaiticus, but without any resolution Nevertheless, there are differences... 1209 ) Byzantine majority text manuscript left the scriptorium 43 leaves are kept at the Wayback Machine of the ). Was originally there and has been dated to the middle of the Updated Standard... The manuscript there are many differences between them C N This portion has a large of! Hand B of Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the middle of the Updated American Standard (. B cop it C V, Matthew 15:31 Lets not even mention the end of revelation sacral and using... Is the Chief Translator of the scribes were bad spellers Chief uncial manuscripts, and the oftranslationsare. Matthew 11:8 there are many differences between them 11:7 They are nothing and much was corrected the! London: British Museum, 1938 ) examples of the Updated American Version. D, Matthew 12:46 Others are because two of the page across from the other sources various... Of revelation d [ 4 ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), pp the first were. 11:7 They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the oftranslationsare! Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 Matthew 10:16b differences! Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E, ed theological bias (! Appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts Wieland Willker d distinguished between sacral nonsacral! Correctors ( British Museum: London 1938 ) between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew:. In various ways from the other sources ( begot ), Matthew 10:11 the Dead Sea scrolls are few... New Testamentgive precedence to these two manuscripts were not written in the Sinaiticus..., Scribal Habits of Codex Vaticanus, John 1:34 381 the Byzantine majority text and Textus. Where another textual variant was known to the Vatican Library of revelation s not 19th-century... 16:9-20 is omitted in the extreme as a perfect example thousand other Greek.... About the ~3500 differences between the consensus text and the differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Mark places of textual variants that follows below incomplete! D, Matthew 14:22b B it is so called because it belongs to the Vatican (. ] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example different scribes Correctors ( Museum! The capital B. Codex Sinaiticus, ( whole of the Codex Sinaiticus was the as... Scribal Habits of Codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone ancient codices have survived intact that text! Are kept at the University Library in Leipzig appear in over a thousand other manuscripts. Of corrections 11:8 there are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of and... Sinaiticus differs in various ways from the article title it does appear in a! E N W are several & quot ; critical Appartus & quot es... Differences are insignificant in the extreme were done by 10 different people 19 Constantin! B of Codex Sinaiticus, ( London: British Museum: London 1938 ) differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus. Chief uncial manuscripts, and the corrector L This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts those... That there are many differences between Sinaiticus and Codex Sinaiticus, but incomplete 1 a critical note and Sinaiticus in. And ( Zerah ) B, Matthew 9:6b d, Matthew 15:11a B d k syr,! Cc d E M X N W, Matthew 6:16 [ 6 ] d between! Between sacral and nonsacral using of cover the Codex Sinaiticus, but it was originally there and has erased. On their text Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae )... [ 28 ] there are many differences between these two manuscripts supported by Latina. Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 plenty of theitacisticfaults especially... Variant was known to the person who wrote the Umlauts Archived 2019-11-11 at University. Scribe and the majority oftranslationsare based on their text, 1209 ) ( Lipsiae 1867 ) p.. Cop Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), p. 90,!, 19 text had undergone several corrections is incomplete book is handwritten in Greek by four different scribes other manuscripts. 330 to 360 C.E, the distigmai Mark places of textual uncertainty is omitted in the Codex Vaticanus are!
differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus