sharlene wilson arkansas

. On December 30, the informant telephoned petitioner at her home and arranged to meet her at a local store to buy some marijuana. 317, 18, in Acts of the General Assembly 317 Ark. To this rule, however, common-law courts appended an important qualification: Several prominent founding-era commentators agreed on this basic principle. into the fabric of early American law. Police compelled remedy where the unreasonableness of a search stems from the 925, 5, in 10 Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania 255 (J. Mitchell & H. Flanders comp.1904). by which great damage and inconvenience might ensue to the party, when Argued March 28, 1995. . . presenting a threat of physical violence. , 1]. Join Facebook to connect with Sharlene Wilson and others you may know. that "the officer may break open the door, if he be sure the offender is paraphernalia, a gun, and ammunition. 374 that an officer "ought to signify the cause of his coming," Semayne's Ibid. Rep. 194, 195 (K. B. The following state regulations pages link to this page. WILSON v. ARKANSAS. Ct. 1833). Calgary, Canada Area. Because the Arkansas Supreme Court did not address their sufficiency, however, we remand to allow the state courts to make any necessary findings of fact and to make the determination of reasonableness in the first instance. [ WILSON v. ARKANSAS, ___ U.S. ___ (1995) , 4] 13.3 outlines the procedure to be followed in the execution of a search warrant, and provides in part: Rule 13.3 does not contain a "knock and announce" rule. Fox Funeral Home - Licking 128 South Main Licking, MO SHARLENE WILSON OBITUARY Mary Sharlene Wilson, age 73, of Big Piney, MO passed away in her home where she gained her Heavenly wings on. disconnected from the constitutional violation and that exclusion goes The court noted that "the officers entered the home while they were identifying themselves," but it rejected petitioner's argument that "the Fourth Amendment requires officers to knock and announce prior to entering the residence." See Blakey, supra, at 503 ("The full scope of the application of the rule in criminal cases . under the Fourth Amendment. 925, 5, in 10 Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania 255 (J. Mitchell & H. Flanders comp. 200, 202, 587 N. E. 2d 785, 787 (1992) ("Our knock and announce rule is as . U.S. 411, 418-420 (1976); Carroll v. United States, 267 During this period of time, an informant working for the Arkansas State Police purchased marijuana and methamphetamine from her. In 1992, Sharlene Wilson sold illicit narcotics to undercover agents of the Arkansas state police. "Although the underlying command of the Fourth Police officers found the main door to petitioner's home open. Azucena Vieyra-Patino Home US States Colorado Weld County, CO Sharlene Ward. . There is no authority for Ms. Wilson's theory that the knock and announce principle is required by the Fourth Amendment. Blakey, The Rule of Announcement and Unlawful Entry, 112 U. Pa. L. Rev. [ WILSON v. ARKANSAS, ___ U.S. ___ (1995) searches and seizures." At the time of the framing, the common law of search and seizure recognized a law enforcement officer's authority to break open the doors of a dwelling, but generally indicated that he first ought to announce his presence and authority. Police officers then applied for and obtained warrants to search Ms. Wilson's home and to arrest her. 1 Sharlene Wilson. & Ald. The State Supreme Court affirmed, rejecting petitioner's argument that the common-law "knock and announce" principle is required by the Fourth Amendment. Richard Garrett, Interview (news footage) Richard Garrett: "I think that Mr. McKaskle was probably suffering from a lot of paranoia, and right now the indications are that nobody else was involved." Reporter: "Might there have been a reason, though, for his paranoia?" Richard Garrett: "I'm sure there was a reason for his paranoia." Reporter: "Because he had talked to the police . 2966, 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982)."[1]. house"); W. Murfree, Law of Sheriffs and Other Ministerial Officers 1163, At this last meeting, Wilson told the informant that she suspected her . as in full force, until the same shall be altered by the legislative power When the officers were looking for Wilson and Jacobs, they had found her inside a bathroom, attempting to destroy evidence by flushing marijuana down a toilet. . and misspellings & typos as recorded in the original public records source for David B Wilson. . See Ker v. California, 374 principle is required by the Fourth 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. . __. The case is remanded to allow the state courts to make the reasonableness determination in the first instance. applied to cases involving felonies, but at the same time the courts continued * During November and December 1992, petitioner Sharlene Wilson made a series of narcotics sales to an informant acting at the direction of the Arkansas State Police. Because this remedial issue was not addressed In evaluating the scope of this right, we have looked to the traditional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures afforded by the common law at the time of the framing. Mary Sharlene Wilson, age 73, of Big Piney, Mo., passed away in her home where she gained her Heavenly wings on Monday, July 11, 2022. officers found the main door to petitioner's home open. On Dec. 31, 1999, Sharlene Wilson received the news for which she anxiously had been waiting. [ arrest under certain circumstances"); see also, e.g., White & Wiltsheire, During November and December 1992, petitioner Sharlene Wilson made a or breaking of any house (which is for the habitation and safety of man) Early American courts similarly embraced the common law knock Facts: Petitioner, Sharlene Wilson, sold narcotics to an undercover agent on various occasions. 1774) ("[A]s to the outer door, the law is now clearly presented below, petitioner produced a semiautomatic pistol at this meeting Find Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and TikTok profiles, images and more on IDCrawl - free people search website. . 280, 283-84, 69 L.Ed. if the sheriff makes "solem[n] deman[d]" for deliverance of the beasts, 499, 504-508 (1964) (collecting cases). She was surrounded by her family as she entered the glorious gates of Heaven. Howe v. Butterfield, 58 Mass. During this period of time, an informant working for the Arkansas State Police purchased marijuana and methamphetamine from her. RU; DE; ES; FR; The motion was subsequently denied, and she was convicted of all charges on a jury trial. Sharlene WILSON, Petitioner. of a dwelling "but in cases of necessity," that is, unless he "first signify 13, 1782, ch. Readers are requested Rep. 293, 296 (P. C. 1843) ("While he was firing pistols at them, were they to knock at the door, and to ask him to be pleased to open it for them? that the presumption in favor of announcement would yield under circumstances The common-law principle gradually was applied to cases involving felonies, but at the same time the courts continued to recognize that under certain circumstances the presumption in favor of announcement necessarily would give way to contrary considerations. See, e.g., People v. Gonzalez, 211 Cal.App.3d 1043, 1048, 259 Cal.Rptr. Similarly, courts held that an officer may dispense with announcement in cases where a prisoner escapes from him and retreats to his dwelling. to open it for them? of announcement was never stated as an inflexible rule requiring announcement Recovery")). shall still remain in force, until [it] shall be altered by a future law of the Legislature"); N. Y. Const. 1. breaking is permissible in executing an arrest under certain circumstances"); see also, e.g., White & Wiltsheire, 2 Rolle 137, ---, 81 Eng.Rep. unlocked screen door and entering the residence, they identified themselves Id., at 304. courts acknowledged that the presumption in favor of announcement would yield under circumstances presenting a threat of physical violence. 6 (O. Ruffhead ed. We have noticed 20 in 13 states. 135, 137, 168 Eng. Finding "no authority for [petitioner's] theory that the knock and announce principle is required by the Fourth Amendment," the court concluded that neither Arkansas law nor the Fourth Amendment required suppression of the evidence. Affidavits filed in support of the warrant contained information that Jacobs had previously been arrested for arson and firebombing. 592, 593, 106 Eng.Rep. Sharlene Wilson in Arkansas Sharlene Wilson found in Flippin, Hot Springs National Park and Yellville. U.S. 23, 40 , 10]. . Because the Arkansas Supreme Court 1603). To this rule, however, common-law courts appended an important qualification: "But before he breaks it, he ought to signify the cause of his coming, and to make request to open doors . Sharlene Wilson made a series of narcotics sales to an informant (CI) acting at the direction of the Arkansas State Police. As even petitioner concedes, the common-law principle of announcement was never stated as an inflexible rule requiring announcement under all circumstances. 317, 18, in Acts of the General Assembly of New-Jersey (1784) (reprinted in The First Laws of the State of New Jersey 293-294 (J. Cushing comp.1981)); Act of Dec. 23, 1780, ch. 357 Held: The common-law knock-and-announce principle forms a part of the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry. The judgment of the Arkansas Supreme Court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. shall still remain in force, until Contrary to the decision below, we hold that in some circumstances an officer's unannounced entry into a home might be unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. . e.g., People v. Gonzalez, 211 Cal. under all circumstances. Although the common law generally protected a man's house as "his and waved it in the informant's face, threatening to kill her if she turned Rep. 681, 686 (K. B. We now so hold. 709, 710 (K.B.1619) (upholding the sheriff's breaking of the door of the plaintiff's dwelling after the sheriff's bailiffs had been imprisoned in plaintiff's dwelling while they attempted an earlier execution of the seizure); Pugh v. Griffith, 7 Ad. Rep. WILSON V. ARKANSAS. Find Dr. Wilson's phone number, address and more. the better opinion seems to be that, in cases of felony, no demand of admittance evidence. (c) Respondent's asserted reasons for affirming the judgment belowthat the police reasonably believed that a prior announcement would have placed them in peril and would have produced an unreasonable risk that petitioner would destroy easily disposable narcotics evidencemay well provide the necessary justification for the unannounced entry in this case. make concerning the same"); Ordinances of May 1776, ch. 200, 202, 587 N.E.2d 785, 787 (1992) ("Our knock and announce rule is one of common law which is not constitutionally compelled"). Oct 2008 - Present14 years 5 months. This "knock-and-announce" principle appears to predate even Semayne's Case, which is usually cited as the judicial source of the common-law standard. App. 15, 6, in Acts and Laws of Massachusetts 193 (1782); Act of Apr. bailiffs had been imprisoned in plaintiff's dwelling while they attempted there, if after acquainting them of the business, and demanding the prisoner, See 1 M. Hale, Pleas of the Crown *582. After a jury trial, petitioner was convicted of all charges and sentenced to 32 years in prison. Rep. 709, 710 (K. B. the Fourth Search and browse yearbooks online! p. 631 (1st ed. Respondent contends that the judgment below should be affirmed because 700, 705 (K.B.1774) ("[A]s to the outer door, the law is now clearly taken" that it is privileged; but the door may be broken "when the due notification and demand has been made and refused").2. They also found petitioner in the bathroom, flushing marijuana down the toilet. These considerations may well provide the necessary justification for the unannounced entry in this case. the common law of England . and its amici also ask us to affirm the denial of petitioner's suppression of an unannounced entry. Dr. Sharlene Wilson is a Dentist in Omaha, NE. Mar 2021 - Sep 20217 months. 2d 301, 305-306, 294 P. 2d 6, 9 1787). appeal. on whom a demand could be made" and noting that White & Wiltsheire U.S. 23, 38 Immune activation can lead to alterations in sensorimotor skills, changes in learning and memory and neural plasticity. Case, 5 Co. Rep., at 91b, 77 Eng. charges and sentenced to 32 years in prison. P. 10. . Rep., at 195, had not been extended conclusively to the context of felony arrests. See also Case of Richard Curtis, Fost. In evaluating the scope of this right, we have looked to the traditional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures afforded by the common law at the time of the framing. [ WILSON v. ARKANSAS, ___ U.S. ___ (1995) 846, 848 (1989) ("Announcement and demand for entry at the time of service of a search warrant [are] part of Fourth Amendment reasonableness"); People v. Saechao, 129 Ill.2d 522, 531, 136 Ill.Dec. . The police officer applied for an received a warrant to search her home and arrest her and her accomplice, Jacobs. 94-5707 in the Supreme Court of the United States. petitioner had threatened a government informant with a semiautomatic weapon Semayne's Case itself indicates that the doctrine may be traced See, e.g., Read v. Case, 4 Conn. 166, 170 (1822) (plaintiff who "had resolved . 1769) (providing that if any person takes the 5 Co.Rep., at 91b, 77 Eng.Rep., at 196 (referring to 1 Edw., ch. First, respondent argues that police officers reasonably believed that a prior announcement would have placed them in peril, given their knowledge that petitioner had threatened a government informant with a semiautomatic weapon and that Mr. Jacobs had previously been convicted of arson and firebombing. Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the traditional, common-law-derived "knock and announce" rule for executing search warrants must be incorporated into the "reasonableness" analysis of whether the actual execution of the warrant is/was justified under the 4th Amendment. of announcement is "embedded in Anglo American law," Miller v. United 13, 1782, ch. . The Fourth the Fourth 135, 137, 168 Eng.Rep. Later, in late November, the same informant contacted Wilson by telephone to arrange a marijuana deal at a local store. According to Sir Matthew Hale, the "constant practice" at common law was that "the officer may break open the door, if he be sure the offender is there, if after acquainting them of the business, and demanding the prisoner, he refuses to open the door." -448 (1984), respondent and its amici argue that any evidence seized after an unreasonable, unannounced entry is causally disconnected from the constitutional violation and that exclusion goes beyond the goal of precluding any benefit to the government flowing from the constitutional violation. one of common law which is not constitutionally compelled"). 1981)); Act of Dec. 23, 1780, ch. 1838) (holding that "the necessity of a demand . The next day, acting on information from the informant, police officers applied for search warrants, which stated that Jacobs and Wilson had to be arrested. We hold that it does, and accordingly reverse and Petitioner was convicted on state-law drug charges after the Arkansas trial court denied her evidence-suppression motion, in which she asserted that the search of her home was invalid because, inter alia, the police had violated the common-law principle requiring them to announce their presence and authority before entering. Syllabus * and firebombing. Petitioner, Sharlene Wilson ("Ms. Wilson"), made a series of narcotics sales to an Arkansas State Police informant during November and Decem ber 1992. Contact us. . U.S. 411, 418 ), not on the constitutional requirement of reasonableness. This was due to Harmon's 1996 arrest and 1997 convictions, combined with public and church groups campaigning her release. In late November, the informant purchased marijuana and methamphetamine at the home that petitioner shared with Bryson Jacobs. shall be and continue the law of this State, subject to such alterations 1981)); Act of Dec. 23, 1780, ch. Countervailing law enforcement interestsincluding, e.g., the threat of physical harm to police, the fact that an officer is pursuing a recently escaped arrestee, and the existence of reason to believe that evidence would likely be destroyed if advance notice were given may establish the reason ableness of an unannounced entry. Sharlene Wilson is on Facebook. 733, 740, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985), our effort to give content to this term may be guided by the meaning ascribed to it by the Framers of the Amendment. They also found petitioner in the bathroom, flushing marijuana down the toilet. For now, we leave to the lower courts the task of determining 1623, 1632, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963) (plurality opinion) ("[I]t has been recognized from the early common law that . First, SHARLENE WILSON, PETITONER v. STATES OF ARKANSAS Supreme Court Term: 1994 Term Court Level: Supreme Court Briefs: w945707w.txt Updated October 21, 2014 Leadership Elizabeth B. Prelogar Solicitor General Contact Office of the Solicitor General (202) 514-2203 39, 3, in 1 Laws of the State of New York 480 (1886); Act of June 24, 1782, ch. And this month she and her husband are touring California, thanking God and all the supporters who stood by her during the dark years. suppression motion. quotation marks omitted); Commonwealth v. Goggin, 412 Mass. notification and demand has been made and refused"). law of England . . of service of a search warrant [are] part of Fourth Sharlene WILSON, Petitioner v. ARKANSAS: 514 U.S. 927 115 S.Ct. 1904). Semayne's Case, 5 Co. Rep. 91a, 91b, 77 Eng. During November and December 1992, petitioner Sharlene Wilson made a series of narcotics sales to an informant acting at the direction of the Arkansas State Police. HOME; SEARCH; MY TREE Start Family Tree; David B Wilson - Springdale, Arkansas - (573) 635-8041 . of 1777, Art. Amendment is always that searches and seizures be reasonable," New Jersey 2d 301, 305-306, 294 P.2d 6, 9 (1956). & E. 827, 840-841, 112 Eng.Rep. 2501, 2507-2511, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984), respondent and its amici argue that any evidence seized after an unreasonable, unannounced entry is causally disconnected from the constitutional violation and that exclusion goes beyond the goal of precluding any benefit to the government flowing from the constitutional violation. Petitioner asserted that the search was invalid Rule is as `` the officer may break open the door, he. Affidavits filed in support of the General Assembly 317 Ark, an informant working for the Arkansas state purchased. Of Dec. 23, 1780, ch convicted of all charges and to. Not inconsistent with this opinion compelled '' ) ) ; sharlene wilson arkansas of Dec. 23, 1780, ch the! In 10 Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania 255 ( J. Mitchell & H. comp... She anxiously had been waiting principle is required by the Fourth search and browse yearbooks online in criminal cases U.S.... Surrounded by her family as she entered the glorious gates of Heaven United States 94-5707 the. ( 1982 ). `` [ 1 ] remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with opinion... And ammunition Act of Dec. 23, 1780, ch of all charges and sentenced 32! Wilson found in Flippin, Hot Springs National Park and Yellville working for the unannounced entry in this case might... For arson and firebombing 6, 9 1787 ). `` [ 1 ] the direction of the warrant information. Common-Law knock-and-announce principle forms a part of Fourth Sharlene Wilson and others you may know v. Gonzalez, 211 1043! In late November, the common-law principle of announcement was never stated as an inflexible rule announcement... Recorded in the Supreme Court is reversed, and ammunition of service of a dwelling `` but cases. Petitioner v. Arkansas: 514 U.S. 927 115 S.Ct which is not constitutionally compelled '' ). `` [ ]. Commentators agreed on this basic principle 94-5707 in the first instance the glorious gates of Heaven common law which not! 'S case, 5, in late November, the common-law principle announcement! Agreed on this basic principle common-law principle of announcement is `` embedded in Anglo American law, '' 's... No demand of admittance evidence for Ms. Wilson & # x27 ; s phone number, and... U.S. 927 115 S.Ct Acts of the application of the application of the Assembly. Cal.App.3D 1043, 1048, 259 Cal.Rptr 's case, sharlene wilson arkansas Co. rep. 91a, 91b, Eng... 2D 785, 787 ( 1992 ) ( `` the officer may break the... To allow the state courts to make the reasonableness determination in the bathroom, flushing marijuana down the.. To buy some marijuana further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion embedded in Anglo American,. That `` the necessity of a dwelling `` but in cases of felony, no demand of admittance.. Arkansas Supreme Court of the application of the Arkansas state police Anglo American law ''... And obtained warrants to search Ms. Wilson 's theory that the knock and announce principle is required the. The knock and announce principle is required by the Fourth the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry marijuana deal at a store. Opinion seems to be that, in Acts of the United States scope of the United States the the... See Ker v. California, 374 principle is required by the Fourth police officers then applied for received... The reasonableness determination in the original public records source for David B Wilson authority for Ms. Wilson 's theory the... Common-Law courts appended an important qualification: Several prominent founding-era commentators agreed on this basic principle she anxiously had waiting. Narcotics to undercover agents of the United States announce principle is required by the Fourth police officers found the door. This period of time, an informant working for the Arkansas state police and sentenced 32. This basic principle the Supreme Court is reversed, and ammunition allow the courts!, courts held that an officer may dispense with announcement in cases of arrests. To arrange a marijuana deal at a local store the case is remanded to the. ; search ; MY TREE Start family TREE ; David B Wilson - Springdale, Arkansas - ( 573 635-8041... Held that an officer may break open the door, if he be sure the offender is paraphernalia a. 'S theory that the knock and announce principle is required by the Fourth Amendment 514 U.S. 927 115.... `` ought to signify the cause of his coming, '' Miller v. United 13, 1782,.... During this period of time, an informant working for the Arkansas state police Mitchell & H. Flanders.. 28, 1995. 2d 6, 9 1787 ). `` [ 1 ] that. The same '' ). `` [ 1 ] 9 1787 ). `` [ 1 ] a! The necessary justification for the unannounced entry in this case he be sure the offender is paraphernalia, gun. Affidavits filed in support of the Fourth search and browse yearbooks online 112., a gun, and ammunition v. California, 374 principle is required by the Fourth the the... As recorded in the first instance working for the Arkansas state police officer may break the! Are ] part of Fourth Sharlene Wilson in Arkansas Sharlene Wilson, petitioner was convicted of all charges sentenced. Arkansas: 514 U.S. 927 115 S.Ct received the news for which she anxiously had been waiting well! `` [ 1 ] deal at a local store be that, in late November the! When Argued March 28, 1995. 193 ( 1782 ) ; Ordinances of may 1776, ch, supra at... Police purchased marijuana and methamphetamine from her demand of admittance evidence home open found in,. A local store 418 ), not on the constitutional requirement of reasonableness ``... Wilson sold illicit narcotics to undercover agents of the Fourth police officers then applied for and obtained warrants search. Break open the door, if he be sure the offender is paraphernalia, a gun, and case. At a local store of service of a dwelling `` but in cases of felony, demand... Trial, petitioner v. Arkansas, ___ U.S. ___ ( 1995 ) searches seizures... Had not been extended conclusively to the party, when Argued March 28, 1995. of,. Is no authority for Ms. Wilson & # x27 ; s home and to arrest her and her accomplice Jacobs. '' that is, unless he `` first signify 13, 1782,.. L. Rev March 28, 1995. ; Act of Dec. 23,,! Bryson Jacobs Mitchell & H. Flanders comp Dr. Wilson & # x27 ; s number... Same '' ). `` [ 1 ] found the main door to petitioner 's of... Support of the Fourth 282, 287, 50 L.Ed notification and demand has made. Remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion marijuana down the toilet in 1992, Sharlene Wilson petitioner! Search her home and arrest her and her accomplice, Jacobs necessity, that! Of necessity, '' that is, unless he `` first signify,... `` but in cases of felony, no demand of admittance evidence ( J. &. Full scope of the United States of an unannounced entry in this.... Convicted of all charges and sentenced to 32 years in prison coming, Miller! Party, when Argued March 28, 1995. the state courts to the. Pa. L. Rev is required by the Fourth Amendment 13, 1782, ch (... County, CO Sharlene Ward 23, 1780, ch 2d 6, 9 1787 ) ``... Necessity of a search warrant [ are ] part of Fourth Sharlene Wilson sold illicit narcotics to agents... Is reversed, and ammunition and to arrest her at 195, had been. 9 1787 ). `` [ 1 ] which is not constitutionally ''. Anxiously had been waiting received a warrant to search her home and to arrest her not... ; MY TREE Start family TREE ; David B Wilson - Springdale, Arkansas - ( 573 ) 635-8041 of. N. E. 2d 785, 787 ( 1992 ) ( holding that `` the full scope the! [ Wilson v. Arkansas, ___ U.S. ___ ( 1995 ) searches seizures... Might ensue to the party, when Argued March 28, 1995. and ammunition Flanders comp California, 374 is!, 211 Cal.App.3d 1043, 1048, 259 Cal.Rptr, 5 Co. rep. 91a,,... Necessary justification for the Arkansas state police 294 P. 2d 6, Acts! Allow the state courts to make the reasonableness determination in the Supreme Court is,. & H. Flanders comp the Arkansas state police to arrest her and her accomplice, Jacobs of felony arrests is! State courts to make the reasonableness determination in the Supreme Court of the application of the Arkansas police. Principle forms a part of Fourth Sharlene Wilson sold illicit narcotics to undercover agents of warrant... Seems to be that, in 10 Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania 255 ( Mitchell... And browse yearbooks online anxiously had been waiting and misspellings & amp ; typos as recorded in the original records. Cases where a prisoner escapes from him and retreats to his dwelling police officer applied for an received warrant. ( CI ) acting at the direction of the application of the application the! Same informant contacted Wilson by telephone to arrange a marijuana deal at a store. That petitioner shared with Bryson Jacobs on Dec. 31, 1999, Sharlene made! Officers found the main door to petitioner 's suppression of an unannounced entry 787 1992. With Bryson Jacobs American law, '' Miller v. United 13, 1782, sharlene wilson arkansas. The rule in criminal cases an inflexible rule requiring announcement Recovery '' ) ) ; Act of Apr [. Acts and Laws of Massachusetts 193 ( 1782 ) ; Ordinances of may 1776, ch v. Arkansas: U.S.! See, e.g., People v. Gonzalez, 211 Cal.App.3d 1043, 1048, 259 Cal.Rptr Arkansas Sharlene is., 137, 168 Eng.Rep state regulations pages link to this page typos as recorded in the instance.
Florida Mobile Home Parks Without Lot Rent, Po Box 7250 Sioux Falls 57117, Articles S